Road & Travel Magazine

Bridgestone - Your Journey, Our Passion
   
RTM WWW
             Bookmark and Share  



Automotive Channel

Auto Advice & Tips
Auto Products
Buyer's Guides
Car Care & Maintenance
Car of the Year Awards
Earth, Wind & Power Awards
Insurance & Accidents
Legends & Leaders
New Car Reviews
News & Views
Planet Driven
Road Humor

Road Trips
Safety & Security
Teens & Tots
Used Car Buying
Vehicle Model Guide
Vehicle Safety Ratings
What Women Want

Travel Channel
Adventure Travel
Advice & Tips
Airline Rules
Bed & Breakfasts
Cruises & Tours
Destination Reviews
Earth Tones
Family Travel Tips
Health Trip
Hotels & Resorts

Luxury Travel
News & Views
Pet Travel
Safety & Security
Spa Reviews
Train Vacations & Tours
Travel Products
What Women Want
World Travel Directory
Contact Us
Media Spokesperson
Contact

Follow Us
Road & Travel Magazine
Facebook | Twitter
Road & Travel Blog

Earth, Wind & Power Media
Facebook | Twitter
Earth, Wind & Power Blog

The Safest Vehicles of 2008

The Safest Vehicles Choices for New Car Buyers

Safety is the number one priority for most drivers when they set out to purchase a new vehicle. With continuous advances in vehicle safety technology, more and more cars on the market are becoming safer options for purchasing drivers.

Each year the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety puts the model year's newest vehicles through a list of rigorous testing to determine just how safe they are. Following the testing, the Institute selects its Top Safety Picks, recognizing vehicles that do the best job of protecting people in front, side, and rear crashes based on ratings in the Institute's tests. Safety Pick winners also have to be equipped with electronic stability control (ESC), which research shows can significantly reduce the risk of crashing.

After testing its vehicles for 2008, results show that automakers have more than doubled the number of vehicles that meet Top Safety Pick criteria.

Crash Test DummyAccording to Adrian Lund, Institute president, vehicle manufacturers are producing and redesigning safer vehicle models throughout the production year.

For the 2008 model year, 13 models qualified as Top Safety Picks in the second half of 2007. However, changes and reintroductions allowed 10 additional vehicles to qualify by 2008. Just recently, another 11 vehicles were added to the growing list for 2008.

This ever-changing list of safe winners makes it easier for consumers to identify vehicles that afford the best overall protection without sifting through multiple sets of comparative crash test results.

"For 2008, consumers have the widest selection of vehicles they've ever had that afford the best protection in the most common kinds of crashes," Lund said.

Crashes tested for by the Institute include front and side impacts, which are the most common kinds of fatal crashes. According to the Institute, nearly 25,000 of the 31,000 people who died in car crashes in 2005 were involved in front or side impacts.

Incredibly common rear-end crashes aren't typically fatal, but they result in a large proportion of the injuries that occur in crashes. Studies show that nearly 60 percent of the insurance injury claims in 2002 alone were for minor neck sprains and strains caused by rear-end crashes.

According to Institute officials, the 2008 Top Safety Pick models have features that allow them to absorb dangerous impacts, or even avoid them altogether.

2008 Safety Pick Winners

Large Cars
Audi A6
Cadillac CTS
Ford Taurus*
Mercury Sable*
Volvo S80

Midsize Cars
Audi A3
Audi A4
Honda Accord**
Saab 9-3
Subaru Legacy*

Midsize Convertibles
Saab 9-3
Volvo C70

Small Cars
Subaru Impreza*

Minivans
Honda Odyssey
Hyundai Entourage
Kia Sedona

Midsize SUVs

Acura MDX
Acura RDX
BMW X3
BMW X5
Ford Edge
Ford Taurus X
Honda Pilot
Hyundai Veracruz**
Hyundai Santa Fe
Infiniti EX35
Lincoln MKX
Mercedes M Class
Saturn Vue***
Subaru Tribeca
Toyota Highlander
Volvo XC90

Small SUVs
Honda CR-V
Honda Element
Subaru Forester

Large Trucks
Toyota Tundra

How the vehicles are evaluated
The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph. Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures from a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test. Each vehicle's overall side evaluation is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of the vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph, representing the front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on two instrumented SID-IIs dummies, assessment of head protection countermeasures and the vehicle's structural performance during the impact.

Injury measures obtained from the two dummies — one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver — are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and/or passenger in a real-world crash would have sustained serious injury. Seats with good or acceptable restraint geometry are tested dynamically using a dummy that measures forces on the neck. This test simulates a collision in which a stationary vehicle is struck in the rear at 20 mph.

Source — Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

* with optional electronic stability control
** built after Aug. 2007
*** built after Dec. 2007

Copyright ©2012 - 2015 : ROAD & TRAVEL Magazine. All rights reserved.