Two Fords Look Back at the Future
The
T-Bird and Bullitt Mustang
by
Denise
McCluggage
The
cars we fell in love with and the cars we fell in love in.
Thats
how the Ford executive evoked the original Thunderbird and the Mustang
in introducing to the assembled motoring journalists the new Thunderbird
and the special edition Bullitt Mustang.
The
music was period; the nostalgia was slathered on with a spatula, and
the romantic appeal may well have resonated with many.
Not
me.
I
certainly never loved those cars back then. I was beyond that. Too
smitten by real sports cars from abroad to do other than
sneer at the pink and port-holed T-Bird or the crude brute that was
the Mustang. (Anyway, my preference among Detroit iron then: the Barracuda.)
But,
funny thing happened on the way to the future. It turns out what the
Ford exec had wrong in my case was the tense, because in the following
few days I fell wide-grin in love with both the new Thunderbird and
the Bullitt Mustang. What a surprise! What a revelation! What fun!
And
it is not that Ive changed; the times and the cars have. The
new millennium versions of these two Fords are more than mere symbols,
more than an easy ploy to stir nostalgic applause: these are real
cars. I can relate to that.
First,
the Bullitt Mustang.
![Ford Bullitt Mustang](../images/bullitt.jpg) |
The
Ford Bullitt Mustang |
Its
a special numbered edition of only 6500 to commemorate the 1968 fastback
Mustang that memorably chased about the hills and environs of San
Francisco in the Steve McQueen movie, Bullitt.
Ford
could have merely painted it pretty, slapped on the Bullitt
name, put a DVD of the flick in each glove box and waited for collectors
to gather. The Ford folks did much more. They tweaked and fiddled
and buttressed producing a singularly desirable machine. (And it can
be had appropriately dark in green, blue or black.)
The
Bullitt is not SVT hot like the Mustang Cobra, but it outperforms
the Mustang GT. Digs out better with good low-end torque, responds
quickly to the throttle at all speeds and handles appreciably better
- thanks to Ford Racing. The car is stiffer and so are the springs
and anti-roll bars, yet the ride is not harsh. The brakes (discs)
are bigger and quite effective. ABS and traction control are also
standard. (Lt. Frank Bullitt, McQueens character, would be speechless,
but then he was always tight-lipped.)
The
Cool Looks department also gets attention: side scoops, neat wheels,
leather. But just maybe the best thing about the Bullitt is its exhaust
note, somewhere between a rumble, a howl and a moan. Dont be
surprised to see a disproportionate number of Bullitts frequenting
roads with tunnels or running beside steep escarpments. The windows
will be down; drivers will be beaming.
The
other grin-producing aspect of the Bullitt Mustang is the fine ride
it gives on tight and curly roads. Taut, responsive with a turn-in
like a barrel-racing pony. It does good work.
Bullitt,
the movie, is supposed to be a guy thing and by extension the Bullitt
Mustang, too. Thats what guys say. Gals know better and no few
of them with $26,830 will be in line for this machine. (Do the blue;
green is too obvious.) [Details
on the Bullitt]
And
now the Thunderbird.
They
got it right, simple as that.
![2002 Ford Thunderbird](../images/tbirdred.jpg) |
The
2002 Ford Thunderbird |
First
off, dont let that word retro escape your lips.
Little besides the name (and the precious port holes in the hard top)
harks back to the original Thunderbird. Oh yes, the subtle reverse
wedge shape evident in the side view. (No using this car for
a doorstop.) That higher-in-front silhouette, designers say, was to
evoke the relaxed, touring-time feel of the first car.
To
me the original T-Bird seemed a bit brittle and edgy. The 2002 T-Bird
is more like a licked ice cream cone. And as smooth and sweet. In
appearance alone it has more presence, more tactile sense than any
T-Bird ever.
Maybe
the wrap-up word is charm.
The
T-Bird is indeed charming and thats not by chance. It is evident
that a lot of chin-in-hand contemplation went into this car - a lot
of care not to make it too slick, too continental, too non-American,
too past, too future. They danced at the edge of the light.
Again,
they got it right.
Ford
had the good sense not to even whisper the word sports car
around the first T-Bird. It was a personal car. Two seats,
automatic transmission, power steering, power seats and even power
windows if you wanted them. (We sports car drivers had plastic side
curtains and a canvas flap to stick a cold hand out of to pay the
toll. Of course we sneered at those other guys and their comfort.)
If
the new T-Bird is personal then personal is about a foot
longer than 1955. (But 7 plus inches shorter than the Lincoln LS,
to which the T-Bird is closely related.) And personal
in 2002 means a whole lot closer to a sports car than it ever has
before. (Ignore completely those over-inflated years of the bloated
T-Birds.)
Yes,
the T-Bird is melted-chocolate smooth on good road surfaces. Isnt
that expected? It even tames the roughness of scabby pavement. But
then, still dressed for the club, it zips around a tightening bend
and aims for a late apex. Almost apologetic to be so good at this.
Was that a little float there, a bit of body roll, a tiny push? Never
mind. Inconsequential. And the esses are taken true and well and the
next turn and the next winding to clouds draped in the trees and pitching
down again in a coil and the Michelins hang in there and car feels
balanced and collected. (I wanted to say to my driving companion:
This isnt supposed to do this so well, but I am
dancing with the T-Bird, mute at the still point, delighted in my
surprise.)
![2002 T-Bird](../images/tbirdyellow.jpg) |
The
2002 T-bird with hard-top option |
But
isnt it arrogant to be surprised? I have admired similar qualities
in engine and handling in the Lincoln LS sedan, that close relative.
Flaws?
Yes, I can find them. Not in the brakes, though, or the suspension.
Maybe not enough low-end torque. Why not add a manual transmission
to direct the 3.9 liter four-cam V-8? Easier to surf the torque curve
that way. But then thats not what the T-Bird is meant for. And
the six-speed automatic is quite smooth at that.
The
interior of the T-Bird is right enough. Which means right to this
T-Bird at this time. The interior is not perfect but it is perfectly
American and a perfect fit for the T-Bird. It could have been otherwise.
J
Mays, boss design man at Ford, was quite recently at Audi, emperor
of interiors. He knows about slick, shining, dotted-cleverness like
the TT. Or elegant stylish exercises like the A6. But he didnt
let them do that to the T-Bird. He must have remembered the red earth
of his native Oklahoma just in time and Uncle Sammed the T-Bird just
the right amount. (The borrowed-looking dash and center console and
the ubiquitous Ford switches feed that feeling as well as saving money.)
You
gotta love it all.
The
exterior starts out being pretty much of OK (despite the plastic grille
that looks a little too plastic) and then grows on you. That elongated
turquoise-touched bird emblem on the rounded hood is simply lovely.
And lordy the tail lights! Maybe better than driving this car is following
it around admiring the simple but glorious taillights. (Perhaps I
have the beginning of a fetish here - Im smitten by the taillights
on the PT Cruiser, too.)
Oh
yes, colors. A brush with memory is the oh-so-50s turquoise
(though less toothpaste-looking than the original T-Birds) and
a reminiscent yellow. (Those are 2002 colors only.) Red, black, white.
Looks good in all of them.
The
Thunderbird has a smooth-operating power soft top. Up and down is
a snap. Optional is a hard top (with required port holes) that needs
two sturdy people to deal with. (When its left behind in the
garage it rests on a frame that comes with it.)
That
hardtop is a $2,500 option. The deluxe T-Bird (theres no basic)
lists for $35,495. The premium Bird is $36,495. Theres
a bunch of equipment that goes with that. A good value, this T-Bird.
![2002 T-Bird Interior](../images/tbirdinside.gif) |
The
2002 T-Bird interior
(Neiman-Marcus Edition) |
The
cockpit is comfortable and roomy enough for two adults, but better
they be penniless with no belongings. A small curved space behind
the seats might hold a tote bag or light shopping. The trunk would
be best used stuffed with assorted soft-sided bags. Dont stay
away long.
And
dont let a rain catch you because if the top has to go up, the
stiffened tonneau cover has to come off...and where to put it if the
trunk is full? The Ford design team had better go back to the CAD
program and come up with a way to deal with the tonneau - maybe hinge
it so it can sit like a dish in the trunk and hold the meager luggage.
Otherwise design a top that looks complete when down without a cover.
Quibble,
quibble. When youre in love, its a foible -- not a fault.
[Details
on the T-Bird]
|